Parathyroid Q&A is a community of experts and patients dedicated to understanding and treating Parathyroid Disease.

Treatment

The treatment of parathyroid disease depends on the type (primary or secondary) and the underlying cause. Getting the right diagnosis is the first step in treatment.

This question is regarding Direct Visualization of all 4 parathyroids versus radioguided parathyroidectomy. When directly visualizing the 4 parathyroids, is it easy to tell a normal gland versus a hyperactive gland? I'm sure it is easy to tell if one is grossly enlarged but if it is going abnormal (producing too much PTH) but not yet enlarged, can that be seen or can it only detected by the radioactivity? If 2 of the glands are abnormal or will become abnormal, do they usually become abnormal at the same time? The reason I ask this question is that I see you worked at the Norman Parathyroid Center who uses the radioguided method while you prefer the direct visualization method. Do you still run a sestamibi scan before each surgery but simply don't take a sample of each gland to test individually for radioactivity? Is it just a difference in your views on sampling via visual and being able to tell by size or texture or other feature rather than radioactivity and consequential exposure for patients? Since 20% have more than one gland hyperactive, I'm wondering how certain the visualization is or if in certain cases you do test. I see your method is different now from what you did at Norman Center and just wondered why you changed.
Thank you for your question. It touches on several important aspects of parathyroid surgery. I was at the Norman Parathyroid Center for six years, and was the Medical Director when I left to start my own practice. In starting my own center, I took a close look at our practices in Florida and critically evaluated each one. For the most part, the operation that I do here is the same as the one I ...